Home

Caltech
Center for Neuromorphic Systems Engineering

Home
Research
News
People

[back]

Attentional modulation of visual motion perception using novel wavelet stimuli Ð Combination study of Psychophysics and fMRI imaging
N. Tsuchiya, G. Rees, J. Braun & C. Koch

Abstract. We have previously characterized the effects of withdrawing attention on detection and discrimination of static visual stimuli (Lee et al. Nat Neuro 1998). Here we report attentional modulation of motion perception in psychophysics experiment. A novel motion stimulus comprising spatio-temporally contrast-modulated Gabor wavelets was used to distinguish attentional effects on mechanisms sensitive to component motion from those sensitive to pattern motion (Schrater et al Nat Neuro 2000). In the second experiment, we confirmed our component stimulus only activates only early visual cortex by functioal magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) measurement, supporting our argument in psychophysics and consistent with our previous result (Rees et al. Nat Neuro 2000).

Psychophysics
Methods. Multiple moving wavelets were presented as a composite patch (1° diameter) presented approximately 4° from fixation. Each wavelet had a random orientation and phase, and moved orthogonally to its orientation. A local wavelet mask of different orientation and contrast was superimposed on each target wavelet. This composite stimulus is expected to selectively activate component motion mechanisms located in primary visual cortex. A concurrent letter discrimination task presented at fixation was used to withdraw attention from the peripheral motion stimulus. Observers performed a 2AFC target detection task on the peripheral stimulus, while contrast and local direction of the mask wavelets was systematically manipulated.

Results. Novel moving wavelet stimuli was successfully used to characterize the effects of withdrawing attention on component-motion sensitive mechanisms. 1) Contrast increment thresholds for motion detection showed a ÔdipperÕ function 2) At low contrast masking, we found direction selectivity in facilitation effect, which was independent of attention. This sugggests local component mechanism in early visual cortex is direction selective and independent of attention. 3) At hight contrast, we found larger threshold elevation when attention was withdrawn, but not direction selective. This suggests local direction selective mechanism is dominated by global mechanism which is not direction selective and dependent on attention. Global mechanism may be either a) interaction between local mechanisms or b) mechanism, which integrates inputs from local mechanism, which locates in later visual cortical area, such as component cells in MT/V5 which have larger receptive fields with similar property in cells in V1.

FMRI Imaging
Methods. 4 trained subjects were scanned while they performed a psychophysical task that is similar to the above in a 2T VISION scanner, in functional imaging laboratory (FIL) in UCL. Using blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) fMRI, we characterized the cortical areas sensitive to component and pattern motion stimulus. Multiple moving wavelets (11° diameter) were presented 13° to the both sides of fixation point. Subjects used a pad to indicate the global direction of the moving wavelets of either side of the stimulus (Direction of attention was directed before each block and constant during the block). In pattern motion situation (100% coherence), the wavelets moved coherently and rigidly to only one direction. Subjects indicated the direction (8° towards left or right). In component motion (50% coherence), the wavelets contained 50% of wavelets consistent with either up or down, which subjects reported. Contrast (10% or 80%), coherence (50% or 100%), and location of attention was manipulated systematically across the blocks (2x2x2 factorial design).

Results. When compared high to low ÔcontrastÕ blocks, we observed activation difference only in V1, consistent with the past reports. When compared high to low ÔcoherenceÕ, we observed differential activation in higher visual areas sensitive to motion (V5/MT and posterior parietal cortex) but no difference in V1. The results supports our argument in psychophysics that our component motion stimulates mainly V1 and reflects the property of early visual motion processing.

 

top