| |
| Fly
Flight Simulator to Study Visual and Rotational Stimuli
John Bender, Michael Dickinson, Pietro Perona
The fly
flight arena was designed (not by me!) to explore the connections between
the different sensory modalities that fruit flies use to control their
flight. The fly is glued to a metal post mounted in the center of a
cylindrical arena. The walls of this cylinder are made out of 11,340
LEDs which are controlled in real time by a computer. (Flies have poor
spatial resolution, estimated at 5°, but very fast temporal resolution
- around 200 Hz. Human vision has spatial resolution of about 1/30th
degree and temporal resolution around 20 Hz.) (full
report)
|
| Visuo-olfactory
sensory fusion for flight behavior in flies
Mark Frye, Michael Dickinson
Over the
past year I have used the support of this grant to study the neurobiological
basis of multisensory flight control in flies. I have specifically focused
on vision and olfaction and how feedback from these sensory modalities
is integrated to coordinate complex spatiotemporal dynamics of search
behaviors. Using a state-of-the-art stereo video system, I tracked freely
flying flies within different sensory landscapes and found that visual
expansion cues generated as flies approach vertical edges is required
for odor localization (Fig. 5A). Using a 'virtual reality' tethered
flight simulator, I examined the fine scale motor responses to visual
expansion, odor, and both presented simultaneously. Our results show
that during flight sensorimotor responses to odor are linearly superimposed
upon visual responses (Fig. 5B). This is a remarkable finding because
it suggests that – from an engineering perspective - the underlying
neural processing for tracking multiple sensory cues is relatively simple.
A parallel sensory-to-motor control architecture may be an evolutionary
adaptation that imparts both the extraordinary flexibility and robustness
exhibited by flies in diverse sensory landscapes. These results have
culminated in one publication, presentations at two international meetings,
and two more manuscripts to be submitted for publication this month.
(full report)
|
| Modular
Electronics for Rapid Development of Behavioral Stimuli
Michael Reiser, Michael Dickinson
Whereas
flies use many sensory modalities, most of the behaviors we casually
observe are dominated by visual control. For this reason, presenting
controlled visual environment to tethered flies continues to be a powerful
experimental paradigm. Most experiments have been done in simple arenas,
either patterns attached to a rotating drum, or in recent years, using
cylinders covered with LEDs. Conventional display technologies (LCDs,
CRTs, etc.) can not be used as stimuli for insect experiments, because
their refresh rates are typically several times slower than the flicker
fusion rate of insect visual systems. LEDs are used because they can
be rapidly refreshed, which is necessary to maintain the illusion of
motion. We have designed modular panels of 64 LEDs each, which can be
snapped together to ‘tile’ an experimental environment with
controllable displays. The panels are individually addressed and communicated
with via a rapid serial interface. The panels have been designed to
be extremely bright (with the added flexibility of individual pixel
programmable brightness control), allowing experimentation over a broad
range of behaviorally relevant stimuli conditions. The panels are controlled
via a microprocessor controller which, for most experiments, will not
require a computer in the loop, significantly reducing the infrastructure
necessary for experiments. This technology allows an experimenter to
build a visual arena with a customized geometry in a matter of hours.
(full report)
|
| Vision
as a Compensatory Mechanism for Disturbance Rejection in Upwind Flight
Michael Reiser, Michael Dickinson, Sean Humbert, Richard Murray
For several
decades the visuo-motor control system of flies has been extensively
studied. However, recent results have cast new light on many long standing
assumptions about the operation of the flight control system. In this
project we seek to demonstrate that through a faithful model of the
fly's behavior, it is possible to provide some context within which
controlled behavioral assays can be interpreted. (full
report)
|
| A
Biosphere for Studying Neural Circuits of Drosophila melanogaster
Jasper Simon, Michael Dickinson
Research
Proposal. Observation rather than experimentation dominates the
study of animal behavior, a limit to our understanding. We require the
ability to study behavior while aspects of an animal's environment can
be controlled. To meet this goal, I plan a biosphere in which I can
control various parameters to recapitulate the pertinent aspects of
an animal's natural environment.
Seasonal change and undesirable habitats force animals to assess local
resources and decide between to stay or to move somewhere potentially
more desirable. Cues from both the environment and an animal's current
internal state influence such decisions. What mechanisms underlie the
ability to integrate and process these cues? Is movement directed simply
by cue saliency? Or do animals carry out some rudimentary cost-benefit
analysis?
Within a neuroethological context, resource leaving in the fruit fly
Drosophila melanogaster provides a useful model to study such elementary
decision making. With the molecular tools available in Drosophila, I
propose to study the neural circuits involved in this process.
|
| Neurogenetic
Dissection of Resource Choice in the Fruit Fly Drosophila melanogaster
Jasper Simon, Michael Dickinson
Abstract.
I propose to study the neurogenetic mechanisms that underlie resource
choice in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Specifically, how do
genes regulate the decision to leave resources? In natural environments
the distribution and abundance of resources vary over space and time—quite
scarce during certain times in the life of a fly. Thus, it seems flies
would stay indefinitely on an established resource, but casual observation
proves this false. At various times scales: moment-to-moment, over the
course of a day, or throughout a lifetime, flies leave resources. What
external and internal cues influence the probability to leave? How do
these cues interact? Moreover, this behavior initiates dispersal and
has implications for the animal’s life history. Within a neuroethologcal
context, resource leaving in flies provides a useful model to study
elementary decision-making in a simple nervous system. I aim to characterize,
identify, and define the relative contribution of external sensory cues,
internal state cues, and their interactions in the determination of
resource choice. Using molecular and population genetic approaches,
I will attempt to identify the neuronal circuits and genes that participate
in the regulation of resource choice.
|
|